2011-05-18 19:53:26That Jalbring (2003) atmospheric mass paper
John Mason

johntherock@btopenworld...
86.146.81.187

Hi folks,

There seems to have been a denier resurgence of late and one that keeps getting foisted upon the readerships of various newspaper comment-threads such as the Guardian's CIF is that Jalbring 2003 paper in E&E.

 When this popped up at the Guardian a day or two ago, I did do a search on Skeptical Science for a quick response as I had to go out, but couldn't find one. Given they are playing it again at the moment, I wonder if a rebuttal might be timely? Unfortunately, the physics required is a bit out of my depth, although it seems even to me that the author has gotten several things rather mixed-up. If they're going to keep throwing it about the place then a couple of paragraphs explaining what's wrong with it might be useful so that we can post links - not to win any argument with an individual denier but for the public to follow and make their own minds up.

Cheers - John

 

2011-05-18 20:59:20
Rob Painting
Rob
paintingskeri@vodafone.co...
118.93.27.102

Don't this will get much attention here John, try the general chat section, most people seem to hang out there.

2011-05-19 17:30:28
John Mason

johntherock@btopenworld...
86.146.81.187

Thanks Rob - will do!

Cheers - John