2011-02-12 11:25:19Monckton Myth #11: Carbon Pricing Costs vs. Benefits
dana1981
Dana Nuccitelli
dana1981@yahoo...
38.223.231.252
I've finished drafting up Monckton Myth #11: Carbon Pricing Costs vs. Benefits.  Have a look, let me know if you have any feedback.
2011-02-12 23:29:05Looks good
John Cook

john@skepticalscience...
124.186.217.214
Great work, Dana. Nice for that costs of action vs inaction graphic to finally make it into the sun.
2011-02-13 07:25:30thanks
dana1981
Dana Nuccitelli
dana1981@yahoo...
69.230.107.233

Thanks John, it will be good to get this post out after sitting on it for a couple of months too :-)  It's a pretty big one, because really almost all of AGW "skepticism" is based on the premise that carbon pricing will cripple the economy.  When arguing with "skeptics", it's amazing how often you can get them to boil down to that fundamental belief.

Anyone else got comments?

2011-02-15 12:27:49
Andy S

skucea@telus...
66.183.175.241

Hi Dana

The spelling of the economist's name is Nordhaus, not Nordhouse


2011-02-15 13:15:13Whoops
dana1981
Dana Nuccitelli
dana1981@yahoo...
69.230.107.233
Whoops, I knew that too. Thanks Andy, will correct.