2011-12-25 15:09:35Our Grinch, Doug Cotton is back: again
Daniel Bailey
Daniel Bailey
yooper49855@hotmail...
97.83.150.37

Our Grinch, Doug Cotton is back, this time as ThereIsNoGreenhouse.
IP:  124.184.188.134

ThereIsNoGreenhouse at 15:02 PM on 25 December 2011
To read screen captures of my recent posts which have been deleted because SkS has no valid counter argument please click here (for the page of SkS errors) and then click the first link. I have started to pay for a few hundred views per day of this page.

ThereIsNoGreenhouse at 14:11 PM on 25 December 2011
There is no empirical evidence that back radiation from the atmosphere actually can warm the surface. Such evidence is of fundamental importance to the claim of an atmospheric greenhouse effect.

Professor Claes Johnson shows here why only high energy incident solar radiation above a cut off frequency can be converted to thermal energy. Prof Nahle has proven this in his September 2011 experiment and looks like doing so again in a current experiment. This debunks the claimed atmospheric greenhouse effect.


Account disabled; Doug will be back until this IP is blocked.

Merry Christmas indeed.

2012-01-01 14:15:23This time as FutureClimate
Daniel Bailey
Daniel Bailey
yooper49855@hotmail...
97.83.150.37
  • Hockey stick is broken
    Whether or not there is any world-wide hockey stick, it is clear from evidence such as Arctic records that carbon dioxide has no effect. The reason it has no effect is that (as has been proved here) back radiation does not have sufficient energy to overcome the threshhold frequency (determined by Wien's Displacement Law) which would be necessary to allow the required ionization for radiated energy to be converted to thermal energy. The low energy radiation from back radiation is returned to the atmosphere after having absolutely no effect on surface temperature.
  • Hockey stick is broken
    Indeed - a long term natural trend totally unaffected by the onset of industrial age. Northern Ireland is strongly affected by Atlantic Ocean temperatures which, together with rates of current flow, affect ice formation and melting in the Arctic Ocean.

    So let's look at the whole Arctic region since 1880 where temperatures are supposed to respond to carbon dioxide more than anywhere else in the world, but don't respond at all.



    Note the higher temperatures 1935-1945 and the steep 4 degree rise 1919-1939.
    Moderator Response: [Rob P] Interesting that you mention the Arctic. Note the Arctic sea ice hockey stick (blade is facing down): There has been a dramatic, and unprecedented loss in summer sea ice cover in the last few decades. And you seem to be referring to polar amplification, which is not necessarily a fingerprint of the increased Greenhouse Effect, but of a warming Earth, due to decreased albedo (reflectivity) as ice cover decreases. Not surprisingly that is observed too.
  • Hockey stick is broken
    Some of the longest temperature records date from 1796 for Northern Ireland and show no hockey stick whatsoever.



    Moderator Response: [Rob P] Please keep image width to 450 in future. Also note that one temperature series, from one location over a period which does not include the MWP (thermometers did not exist then), is not very enlightening. We are talking about global warming afterall. However, I do note the obvious warming trend at Armagh.

Enquiring minds want to know:  What Screen Name ID will Doug use next?

My WAG (Wild-Ass-Guess):  Climate MythMaker