2011-12-18 17:06:01Bloodbath on the "Climate sensitivity is low" thread
Daniel Bailey
Daniel Bailey
yooper49855@hotmail...
97.83.150.37

It became undeniable that RW1 was seeking to rehash the Lindzen & Choi threads and the 2nd Law threads all over again with his intentional obfuscating.

Regretfully I unsheathed my Lizzie Borden-era axe and lopped off some dead wood.

Apologies to all who put some time and effort into it & were caught up in the crossfire.

2011-12-19 02:22:39My perspective
John Hartz
John Hartz
john.hartz@hotmail...
98.122.98.161

As I stated on the General Chat blog, RW1's confusion...

Seems to me that RW1 is having the time of his life getting such a large number of SkS authors to chase after him for days on end.

 Ditto for TOP.

2011-12-19 02:54:14
Daniel Bailey
Daniel Bailey
yooper49855@hotmail...
97.83.150.37

TOP is next.  He has already been given a 2nd Warning (on the 2nd Law thread, ironically) here.

2011-12-19 04:17:53Some good stuff lost
muoncounter
Dan Friedman
dfriedman3@comcast...
76.30.158.238

To be fair, the switch from sensitivity - or at least feedback - into photon by photon symmetry and flux modeling only occurred near the end of last night's proceedings.  RW was primarily pushing the 'blame the clouds, not the CO2' mantra he picked up worshipping at the feet of c02isnotevil. 

 

One of TC's comments was, however, a clear and well-illustrated explanation of the role of CO2 in radiative forcing.  I refer to the one with the correlation of different temperatures to different absorption by different GHGs.  It's too bad the knife had to go back that far.

2011-12-19 05:32:09
Daniel Bailey
Daniel Bailey
yooper49855@hotmail...
97.83.150.37

Sorry, MC.

If you wish, identify which one it was (my dim-bulb brain is focused on wrapping Christmas presents right now) & I'll restore it from the Deleted Comments bin.

2011-12-19 07:32:58Gone from the top 60 deleted comments
muoncounter
Dan Friedman
dfriedman3@comcast...
76.30.158.238

Thanks to our newfound friend jdey123.    It had this image, nicely colored to emphasize the different absorptions. 

 

And when is jdey getting the old heave-ho?

2011-12-19 13:47:12
Daniel Bailey
Daniel Bailey
yooper49855@hotmail...
97.83.150.37

Tom's reinstated comment is here:  http://www.skepticalscience.com/argument.php?a=115&p=6#70242

To look beyond the deleted comments bin's reach:

Comments by a User:

               http://www.skepticalscience.com/users.php

 

Comments by a User (Moderation Admin version):

              http://www.skepticalscience.com/admin_moderate.php?Action=Search

 

The latter search goes back the farthest in time.


Jdey123 has already been banned, as was his other screen ID of jdey123. 

He is now posting more circumspectly as the sock-puppet mace.

2011-12-19 14:29:35
Tom Curtis

t.r.curtis@gmail...
112.213.199.189

Muon and Daniel, thanks for the reinstatement.