![]() | ||
2011-10-16 02:14:14 | Critical Mass = Ken Lambert? | |
Daniel Bailey Daniel Bailey yooper49855@hotmail... 97.83.150.37 |
Opened his SkS account several days after Ken Lambert was banned. Has had several comments censored for inflammatory rhetoric already. Now posting a long BP diatribe without a link to the original comment. And has an identical IP to Ken's banned IP (124.187.16.107). Wasn't the IP-banning process supposed to block IP's? | |
2011-10-16 02:32:43 | ||
Daniel Bailey Daniel Bailey yooper49855@hotmail... 97.83.150.37 |
Having just reviewed cm's comment stream (here) I have little doubts as to my above supposition. His first several comments upon opening the account:
etc, etc, etc; A common theme throughout. | |
2011-10-17 03:42:51 | ||
KR k-ryan@comcast... 69.138.165.234 |
I would agree as well, Daniel. Critical mass's post here appears identical to KL's arguments about integrating solar influences over the last 150 years, complete with a lack of recognition of the role of S-B radiation in addressing such offsets. I'm guessing critical mass=Ken Lambert. | |
2011-10-18 02:24:29 | ||
Albatross Julian Brimelow stomatalaperture@gmail... 199.126.232.206 |
If true, that is pretty poor form by Lambert. Have you seen how Ken is posting long swaths of text posted by BP here at SkS? I I hope Ken is not claiming that he and BP were both banned, BP elected to leave. | |
2011-10-18 02:49:41 | ||
Daniel Bailey Daniel Bailey yooper49855@hotmail... 24.213.18.68 |
Yeah, Albie. That's what aroused my suspicions, at least enough to do the necessary digging. BP did leave voluntarily. But when he reneged on that by continuing his disinformation trolling I slammed the door on him. Technically, he volunteered to leave. Technically, I banned him by changing the locks after he left. 6 of one, half-a-dozen of the other. Meh. | |
2011-10-18 07:12:02 | ||
Rob Painting Rob paintingskeri@vodafone.co... 118.92.37.233 |
Ken pasted the same thing over at Real Climate, on the recent Meehl (2011) thread. |