2011-09-16 21:11:30Back to Spencer..
grypo

gryposaurus@gmail...
173.69.6.13

After the Pielke episode, we are reminded why we got into it.  The official rebuttal in Remote Sensing from Trenberth, Fasullo, and Abraham is out.

 

http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/3/9/2051/pdf

 

Not sure what significance this has for us.  Post?  Update the old one?  It should get some attention.

 

Received: 8 September 2011 / Accepted: 8 September 2011 / Published: 16 September 2011

That's sure to ruffle some feathers.

2011-09-17 00:58:02
Albatross
Julian Brimelow
stomatalaperture@gmail...
199.126.232.206

Agreed Grypo.  I want to have a good look at it first though. 

It was accepted the same day it was received...sigh, more to fuel for the conspiracy theorists.

2011-09-17 01:01:58
grypo

gryposaurus@gmail...
173.69.6.13

Alby, I just saw the word 'Commentary' on the paper.  It is not considered a peer-reviewed article, I gauge.

2011-09-17 02:01:11
dana1981
Dana Nuccitelli
dana1981@yahoo...
64.129.227.4

I read over it this morning.  I think it probably warrants a post - similar findings to Dessler, but a few additional points.  It really hammers home the point that Spencer is not testing anything related to climate sensitivity.

We should update the Spencer rebuttal with this info and make a blog post about it.  I can work on it this weekend.

2011-09-17 02:01:52
Albatross
Julian Brimelow
stomatalaperture@gmail...
199.126.232.206

Probably right Grypo, I hope they got all their i's dotted and t's crossed.....