2011-06-20 04:09:14Goddard cherry picking again
Albatross
Julian Brimelow
stomatalaperture@gmail...
199.126.232.206

Oh the stupid it hurts.

2011-06-20 04:54:18
dana1981
Dana Nuccitelli
dana1981@yahoo...
69.230.102.37
Meh, it's just Goddard. That's what he does.
2011-06-20 10:45:35
John Cook

john@skepticalscience...
121.222.9.229

Must... resist... urge... to respond... to Goddard!

2011-06-20 10:54:21
Rob Honeycutt

robhon@mac...
98.207.62.223

I think Goddard is pretty well marginalized when posting on his own site.  He had a soapbox with WUWT.

2011-06-20 11:59:51His traffic is not inconsequential
John Cook

john@skepticalscience...
121.222.9.229

You have to take these third party stats sites with a grain of salt but here is Goddard's stats compared to SkS:

http://siteanalytics.compete.com/skepticalscience.com+stevengoddard.wordpress.com/

Not bad for a Johnny come lately. I gave him an infusion of traffic when I debunked one of his earlier cherry picked posts and when he gloated about his traffic surge, I've regretted it ever since. Hence the "must... resist... urge..."

2011-06-20 12:54:08
Rob Honeycutt

robhon@mac...
98.207.62.223

John...  I think Goddard's numbers are just a spillover from WUWT.  If he got a surge in numbers from one of your posts then he's just seeing a bunch of our guys over there.  

If you look at it like a sales person, you don't want surge, you want "lift."  That's a surge that pulls your longer term numbers up.

It's hard to tell but I think Goddard's numbers are declining overall.

2011-06-21 18:04:16
Dikran Marsupial
Gavin Cawley
gcc@cmp.uea.ac...
139.222.14.107