2011-05-22 15:28:53Strong atmospheric chemistry feedback to climate warming from Arctic methane emissions
Daniel Bailey
Daniel Bailey
yooper49855@hotmail...
97.83.150.37

Courtesy of Leland Palmer:

Strong atmospheric chemistry feedback to climate warming
from Arctic methane emissions


Ivar S. A. Isaksen,1,2 Michael Gauss,1,3 Gunnar Myhre,1,2 Katey M. Walter Anthony,4
and Carolyn Ruppel5


Received 13 April 2010; revised 4 November 2010; accepted 4 February 2011; published 20 April 2011.


[1] The magnitude and feedbacks of future methane release from the Arctic region are unknown. Despite limited documentation of potential future releases associated with thawing permafrost and degassing methane hydrates, the large potential for future methane releases calls for improved understanding of the interaction of a changing climate with processes in the Arctic and chemical feedbacks in the atmosphere.

Here we apply a “state of the art” atmospheric chemistry transport model to show that large emissions of CH4 would likely have an unexpectedly large impact on the chemical composition of the atmosphere and on radiative forcing (RF). The indirect contribution to RF of additional methane emission is particularly important. It is shown that if global methane emissions were to increase by factors of 2.5 and 5.2 above current emissions, the indirect contributions to RF would be about 250% and 400%, respectively, of the RF that can be attributed to directly emitted methane alone.

Assuming several hypothetical scenarios of CH4 release associated with permafrost thaw, shallow marine hydrate degassing, and submarine landslides, we find a strong positive feedback on RF through atmospheric chemistry. In particular, the impact of CH4 is enhanced through increase of its lifetime, and of atmospheric abundances of ozone, stratospheric water vapor, and CO2 as a result of atmospheric chemical processes. Despite uncertainties in emission scenarios, our results provide a better understanding of the feedbacks in the atmospheric chemistry that would amplify climate warming.

CH4

Radiative forcing resulting from CH4 increases. Blue bars denote contributions from direct emissions, and red bars are contributions from CH4 initiated changes in atmospheric composition.  “CH4 indirect” represents the CH4 enhancement that is due to the increase in its lifetime. “CO2 indirect” relates to the CO2 enhancement due to oxidation of the additional CH4. The lightest colors refer to the 4 × CH4, medium light colors to the 7 × CH4 and dark colors to the 13 × CH4 case. The radiative forcing is not related to a particular year but to the time when the CH4 increase is reached. The 13 × CH4 case refers to a shorter time horizon (30 years) while the other cases are based on a 50 year time horizon.

Citation: Isaksen, I. S. A., M. Gauss, G. Myhre, K. M. Walter Anthony, and C. Ruppel (2011), Strong atmospheric chemistry feedback to climate warming from Arctic methane emissions, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 25, GB2002,
doi:10.1029/2010GB003845.