![]() | ||
2011-09-08 06:46:02 | Critiquing Spencer's Response | |
Sphaerica Bob@Lacatena... 76.28.5.93 |
Does anyone feel qualfied to critique Spencer's knee jerk response to Dessler, on his blog right now? | |
2011-09-08 07:12:21 | ||
dana1981 Dana Nuccitelli dana1981@yahoo... 64.129.227.4 |
On some issues, but there's still a question about the ocean heat transport vs. TOA flux change due to clouds numbers. We're discussing it in Gen Chat. | |
2011-09-08 07:25:23 | ||
dana1981 Dana Nuccitelli dana1981@yahoo... 64.129.227.4 |
Barry Bickmore covered some of the other problems in Spencer's response here. | |
2011-09-08 09:11:46 | ||
Albatross Julian Brimelow stomatalaperture@gmail... 199.126.232.206 |
Think that we had better hold off until we can clarify the ocean temperature issue with Dessler. | |
2011-09-08 22:02:38 | ||
grypo gryposaurus@gmail... 173.69.6.13 |
From Roy's latest post. An update that may be important to our posts
Iÿ'm not sure if this effects us or not, but someone should probably contact Andy Dessler to see if we need to change or update our posts before \"official\" publication. | |
2011-09-09 01:42:13 | ||
dana1981 Dana Nuccitelli dana1981@yahoo... 64.129.227.4 |
Those two changes won't impact our posts. I believe the first is talking about Dessler saying Spencer claimed cloud changes caused ENSO, which we didn't mention. The second is clarifying that clouds, although not a forcing, are a feedback. Something we already knew, but didn't discuss either. It will be interesting to see what comes from the ocean heat transport/cloud TOA discussion. That would impact our posts, but we can publish a revision if necessary. I think it's pretty clear that if anything, the value is closer to Dessler's than Spencer's. It would be great if Spencer admitted that after they work out the discrepancy. |