![]() | ||
2011-09-05 21:21:52 | Blog Posts 05 September to 11 September | |
John Cook john@skepticalscience... 123.211.208.191 |
Mon 05SkS Weekly Digest #14 (Badgersouth) Extreme Flooding In 2010-2011 Lowers Global Sea Level (Rob Painting) Tue 07OA not OK: Booklet available (Doug) On Mowing a Virginia Lawn … And Contemplating a Greenland Iceberg (Bud Ward) Wed 08Dr. Andrew Dessler's New Paper Debunks Both Roy Spencer And Richard Lindzen (Rob P) Thur 09Dessler Demolishes Three Crucial 'Skeptic' Myths (Dana) Fri 10Conspiracy Dog-whistling about GRL and the New Dessler Paper (grypo) Spending A Week Above Arctic Circle On M.S. Fram Off Greenland’s West Coast (Bud Ward) Sat 11Lessons from Past Climate Predictions: IPCC TAR (Dana) Just Desserts, Winning 2011 Eureka Prize (Bern) Sun 12Haydn Washington talks Climate Change Denial with Steamy Toad (John) PendingCERN - Saying Nothing About Cosmic Ray Effects on Climate (Dana) Santer et al. Catch Christy Exaggerating (Dana) Greenhouse Gas: It's not just about CO2 (Mythago) Treehugger Video #6 (John) Icelandic translation to the Guide (John) Not so Permanent Permafrost (Agnostic) | |
2011-09-05 21:28:46 | Fluff pieces | |
John Cook john@skepticalscience... 123.211.208.191 |
Though we usually have 2 posts per day, blog posts like Bud Ward's mowing post, Haydn Washington and Treehugger Video are what I would consider fluff pieces - so if anyone wants to slot a meatier post in those days, sing out (or if you have admin privileges, just shove it in there and publish the post). | |
2011-09-05 22:54:48 | ||
Alex C coultera@umich... 67.194.184.102 |
I am a bit unhappy that the post I had started to work on was included in the weekly report and is still now in the pending section of the weekly listing here. I had commented in that thread that I would like consideration of its removal from the listing, as I have not had the time to develop the post, and especially with newer stories coming out as from McIntyre accusing the report of, essentially, whitewash. Posting a summary article of the report would be late by now (my own fault, I reiterate the apologies I said in my post's thread) but also inappropriately timed as well. Steve has said he is going to follow up on his September 2 post with another supposedly detailing his comments to the NSF when they interviewed him, and I think it prudent to address him. |