![]() | ||
2011-07-24 08:04:49 | Monckton Myth #17: Debate vs. Denniss | |
dana1981 Dana Nuccitelli dana1981@yahoo... 69.230.106.238 |
Response to Monckton's debate Gish Gallop. It's pretty long - I'm wondering if it should be broken into two parts. | |
2011-07-24 23:22:25 | ||
Rob Painting Rob paintingskeri@vodafone.co... 118.92.82.223 |
Yikes!, definitely a two parter! I'm working my way through it. | |
2011-07-25 04:58:19 | broken up | |
dana1981 Dana Nuccitelli dana1981@yahoo... 69.230.106.238 |
Okay I broke it up, and also added a section about Monckton's claim regarding Santer re-writing a section of the IPCC SAR. Monckton Myth #17: Debate vs. Denniss, Part 1 Monckton Myth #17: Debate vs. Denniss, Part 2 | |
2011-07-28 10:36:22 | ||
dana1981 Dana Nuccitelli dana1981@yahoo... 12.186.216.66 |
This one is getting published soon, so....*bump* | |
2011-07-28 19:31:07 | ||
Rob Painting Rob paintingskeri@vodafone.co... 118.92.63.249 |
Looks good. Not so sure about the climate being inherently unstable (Part 2) Maybe a qualifier you mean over longer timeframes? Not a biggie though, just the casual reader might get confused - if it's not stable why worry, it'll just change anyway?
|