2011-07-24 08:04:49Monckton Myth #17: Debate vs. Denniss
dana1981
Dana Nuccitelli
dana1981@yahoo...
69.230.106.238

Response to Monckton's debate Gish Gallop.  It's pretty long - I'm wondering if it should be broken into two parts.

Monckton Myth #17: Debate vs. Denniss

2011-07-24 23:22:25
Rob Painting
Rob
paintingskeri@vodafone.co...
118.92.82.223

Yikes!, definitely a two parter! I'm working my way through it.

2011-07-25 04:58:19broken up
dana1981
Dana Nuccitelli
dana1981@yahoo...
69.230.106.238

Okay I broke it up, and also added a section about Monckton's claim regarding Santer re-writing a section of the IPCC SAR.

Monckton Myth #17: Debate vs. Denniss, Part 1

Monckton Myth #17: Debate vs. Denniss, Part 2

2011-07-28 10:36:22
dana1981
Dana Nuccitelli
dana1981@yahoo...
12.186.216.66
This one is getting published soon, so....*bump*
2011-07-28 19:31:07
Rob Painting
Rob
paintingskeri@vodafone.co...
118.92.63.249

Looks good. Not so sure about the climate being inherently unstable (Part 2) Maybe a qualifier you mean over longer timeframes? Not a biggie though, just the casual reader might get confused - if it's not stable why worry, it'll just change anyway?