Response to Monckton's debate Gish Gallop.  It's pretty long - I'm wondering if it should be broken into two parts.

Monckton Myth #17: Debate vs. Denniss

Yikes!, definitely a two parter! I'm working my way through it.

Okay I broke it up, and also added a section about Monckton's claim regarding Santer re-writing a section of the IPCC SAR.

Monckton Myth #17: Debate vs. Denniss, Part 1

Monckton Myth #17: Debate vs. Denniss, Part 2

Looks good. Not so sure about the climate being inherently unstable (Part 2) Maybe a qualifier you mean over longer timeframes? Not a biggie though, just the casual reader might get confused - if it's not stable why worry, it'll just change anyway?