![]() | ||
2011-05-02 20:30:08 | Blog posts Mon 2 May to Sun 8 May | |
John Cook john@skepticalscience... 124.187.6.188 |
Sorry I've been a little distracted and disorganised of late. Will get this thread started and hope some of the other admins can help keep a steady flow of blog posts lined up so we don't get blockage like we did last week: Mon 2 MayFrauenfeld, Knappenberger, and Michaels 2011: Obsolescence by Design? (Daniel Bailey) Tue 3 MayLindzen Illusion #3 & Christy Crock #5: Opposing Climate Solutions (Dana) Wed 4 MayWhy 450 ppm is missleading (Agnostic - is this ready for public?) Thur 5 MayLindzen Illusion #4: Climate Sensitivity (Dana) Book launch (John) Fri 6 MayClimate Show 12 (John) Sat 7 MayQ and A with Dr Haydn Washington, co-author of Climate Change Denial Sun 8 MayLindzen Illusion #5: Internal Variability (Dana) Mon 9 MayWhat scientists are saying about Skeptical Science (John) PendingBook reviews of Climate Change Denial (John) | |
2011-05-02 22:34:12 | ||
James Wight jameswight@southernphone.com... 112.213.139.45 |
Is there a reason why "missleading" is spelled with two S's, or is that a spelling mistake? I'll be too busy to write anything this week, but I have a few ideas for upcoming posts I'm working on. | |
2011-05-03 01:16:16 | typo | |
dana1981 Dana Nuccitelli dana1981@yahoo... 64.129.227.4 |
I think it's just a typo, James. Neil actually had a slightly better title suggestion - "why 450 ppm is not a safe target" | |
2011-05-03 02:18:43 | ||
nealjking nealjking@gmail... 84.151.40.57 |
Yes, how can a number be "misleading"? unless it's combined with a statement. | |
2011-05-03 02:53:08 | ||
Daniel Bailey Daniel Bailey yooper49855@hotmail... 97.83.150.37 |
Maybe itsth a mythtake. :) I favor 298.7 ppm myself (the highest of the interglacials in the Vostok core). | |
2011-05-03 08:03:07 | ||
Rob Painting Rob paintingskeri@vodafone.co... 118.93.8.40 |
I prefer Neal's title suggestion. | |
2011-05-06 08:16:51 | Upcoming posts by Carbon Brief | |
John Cook john@skepticalscience... 124.187.6.188 |
I've been talking to Robin Webster at Carbon Brief - they're doing a series of articles on climate science issues and will be reposting them as guest posts on SkS. I'm posting the schedule here so I have them at my fingertips down the track: 1. Monday May 16th - cross post rebuttal of myth "CRU are principal source of future projections" |