![]() | ||
2011-06-14 01:32:15 | New PIOMAS data | |
Daniel Bengtsson dbengt@hotmail... 136.163.44.102 |
There is a new version of the PIOMAS model. It shows the anomaly trend is less negative than the previous model suggested. I don't know the reason for this, but perhaps someone here does and could write a post about it before Watts finds out about this. Look here: http://psc.apl.washington.edu/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/schweiger/ice_volume/BPIOMASIceVolumeAnomalyCurrentV2.png Or, to comare with the previous model: http://psc.apl.washington.edu/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/schweiger/ice_volume/ | |
2011-06-14 18:34:49 | PIOMAS | |
Daniel Bengtsson dbengt@hotmail... 136.163.44.102 |
I guess this article expains it. http://psc.apl.washington.edu/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/schweiger/pubs/IceVolume-2011-06-02-accepted-with-figures.pdf | |
2011-06-14 19:53:30 | ||
Rob Painting Rob paintingskeri@vodafone.co... 118.93.4.254 |
Daniel, suggest you post in the general chat forum in future. It's where most people hang out and comment. A lot of other sections get ignored - just the way it is. | |
2011-06-14 21:24:12 | ||
Daniel Bengtsson dbengt@hotmail... 136.163.44.102 |
Thanks Rob! | |
2011-06-15 01:12:00 | Figure from the paper | |
Robert Way robert_way19@hotmail... 134.153.162.53 |
| |
2011-06-15 07:46:32 | ||
Daniel Bengtsson dbengt@hotmail... 79.136.17.186 |
Robert, I think you should compare these two images. The top one is the graph currently displayed on the PIOMAS page. The bottom one is the version 2 graph.
| |
2011-06-18 06:48:00 | Comment | |
Robert Way robert_way19@hotmail... 142.162.12.211 |
Here is what the data actually looks like when smoothed over 365 days. | |
2011-06-18 13:48:54 | Data | |
James Wight jameswight@southernphone.com... 112.213.169.154 |
Rob, do you have the actual numerical data? All I've ever been able to find is the volume anomaly trend graph. | |
2011-06-18 21:55:57 | Comment | |
Robert Way robert_way19@hotmail... 142.162.12.211 |
Hey James. You can find the data here: |