![]() | ||
2010-08-10 17:00:26 | Suggestion - "launching" each basic rebuttal as a blog post | |
John Cook john@skepticalscience... 121.222.17.49 |
Quick status report - over next day, am looking to update the Rebuttal List page so you can all start adding your basic rebuttals to the database. Next step after that, reprogram the front end so they can go live. So not that far away from this all hitting the cold hard light of day :-) What does everyone think of this idea - when a new Basic rebuttal is ready to go live, we also post it up as a blog post. Some of the benefits of this:
Just some thoughts running through my head. Any other comments on the blog post idea? | |
2010-08-10 17:26:46 | I'm for it personally | |
gpwayne Graham Wayne graham@gpwayne... 81.132.177.33 |
Yup - think that's a good idea. The basic versions may be helpful to those unclear about the issues, or those arguing them may like a concise version they can send on to others or repost. | |
2010-08-13 05:42:19 | Yes! | |
doug_bostrom dbostrom@clearwire... 184.77.83.151 |
Particularly like the \"tempering by fire\" notion. If there are any little problems we can be sure volunteer reviewers will point them out. One thought/reservation is, what happens to the comments thread? There was some discussion about whether threads from various levels of treatment should be forked or monolithic. I strongly lean to \"monolithic.\" Can comment threads from the blog posts be unified w/the static topics? (I mean, Iÿ'm sure they can be if somebody grinds on code long enough but...) |